TK-11041: a 7-pattern price ask that could remove the portal blocker

56bff110e344b8f88a69f55fa1dfefa9e6ef211f · 2026-09-12 07:34:38 -0700 · Steve Abrams

The email price lists showed Innovations prices at PATTERN level, so the 39 SKUs
need 7 numbers, not 39 — small enough to be answerable in one reply. A blanket
'send your price list' was refused twice in 2026, but a narrow named ask has
precedent in this mailbox. The Whistler email is already going to Hektor; adding
this paragraph costs nothing and, if answered, makes the credential paste unnecessary.

Not merged — the draft is agent_composed=false and Steve already chose send-as-is
before this finding existed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Files touched

A tk11041-innovations-reconcile/rescrape/PRICE-ASK-TO-ADD.md

Diff

commit 56bff110e344b8f88a69f55fa1dfefa9e6ef211f
Author: Steve Abrams <steve@designerwallcoverings.com>
Date:   Sat Sep 12 07:34:38 2026 -0700

    TK-11041: a 7-pattern price ask that could remove the portal blocker
    
    The email price lists showed Innovations prices at PATTERN level, so the 39 SKUs
    need 7 numbers, not 39 — small enough to be answerable in one reply. A blanket
    'send your price list' was refused twice in 2026, but a narrow named ask has
    precedent in this mailbox. The Whistler email is already going to Hektor; adding
    this paragraph costs nothing and, if answered, makes the credential paste unnecessary.
    
    Not merged — the draft is agent_composed=false and Steve already chose send-as-is
    before this finding existed.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---
 .../rescrape/PRICE-ASK-TO-ADD.md                   | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tk11041-innovations-reconcile/rescrape/PRICE-ASK-TO-ADD.md b/tk11041-innovations-reconcile/rescrape/PRICE-ASK-TO-ADD.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..42b55ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tk11041-innovations-reconcile/rescrape/PRICE-ASK-TO-ADD.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# One paragraph that could delete the portal blocker entirely
+
+**Draft:** `r-5469570474427181957` (msg `1a09124ac539ff62`), info@ → hmartinez@innovationsusa.com.
+**UNSENT.** Steve chose "send as-is" on 2026-09-11 — *before* the price-list findings below existed.
+This is a new fact, not a re-ask of the question he already answered.
+
+## What changed
+
+We now know Innovations prices at **pattern level, not per colorway** — so our 39 SKUs need
+exactly **7 numbers**, not 39. That makes the ask small enough to be answerable in one reply.
+
+We also know the email route has limits: Innovations refused a **blanket** "send your whole price
+list" twice in 2026 (Currier 2026-06-17, Hektor 2026-09-02), both times redirecting to the portal.
+But a **narrow, named** ask has precedent in this mailbox — a single-SKU "Stock and Price Check"
+thread got a direct answer. Seven named patterns is much closer to that than to "send me everything".
+
+**If he answers it, the portal credential is no longer needed for this ticket.** If he redirects to
+the portal again, we have lost nothing — the Whistler question still gets asked in the same email.
+
+## The paragraph (drop in after the Whistler paragraph, before "Thank you,")
+
+> While we're updating our records, could you also confirm the current per-yard net for these seven
+> patterns: Costine, Enchase, Flanders, Province, Skylark, Tatami, and Vinyl Cork? We have the Fall
+> 2025 list and just want to be sure we're quoting current numbers.
+
+**HTML (matches the draft's existing markup):**
+
+```html
+<p>While we're updating our records, could you also confirm the current per-yard net for these
+seven patterns: <strong>Costine, Enchase, Flanders, Province, Skylark, Tatami</strong> and
+<strong>Vinyl Cork</strong>? We have the Fall 2025 list and just want to be sure we're quoting
+current numbers.</p>
+```
+
+## Why worded this way
+- **Names the seven.** A specific list is answerable in one line; "your price list" is the ask that
+  was already refused twice.
+- **Says we have the Fall 2025 list.** Signals we are not asking him to do work we could do
+  ourselves, and quietly explains *why* we're asking — we know it is stale.
+- **"per-yard net"** uses his own unit, and asks for NET so we don't have to infer list-vs-net a
+  second time.
+- **Zero DW or private-label names** — the "none of our names" directive holds.
+
+## Reference: the Fall 2025 LIST prices we already have (NOT current — do not import)
+
+| Pattern | Prefix | SKUs | Oct-2025 list $/yd |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Costine | CSO | 3 | 45.95 |
+| Enchase | ENS | 6 | 69.95 |
+| Flanders | FLN | 5 | 112.95 |
+| Province | PRO | 1 | 29.95 |
+| Skylark | SKL | 4 | 129.95 |
+| Tatami | TTM | 7 | 59.95 |
+| Vinyl Cork | VCO | 13 | 49.95 |
+
+Provably superseded: three patterns present in both these PDFs and the June-2026 portal crawl rose
+a further 3–7% after October 2025. Our discount (10%, settled by Sales Order O-111475) comes off
+these. **Useful as a sanity check on whatever the portal or Hektor returns — a pulled number wildly
+off this trend means something is wrong — and useful for nothing else.**
+
+## Status
+**NOT merged.** The draft is `agent_composed=false`; the next action on it is Steve sending it.
+Say the word and it goes in with one call, restore point captured first — same as the last merge.

← 9005ea5 TK-11041: email price-list reconciliation for the 39 Innovat · back to Dw Unbuyable Recovery Pilot · TK-11041: restore point before merging the 7-pattern price a 334ea0d →