`tk11041-innovations-reconcile/rescrape/FINAL-vendor-letter.md`

68 lines
# TK-11041 — Innovations line-sheet request, FINAL amended text

**To:** hmartinez@innovationsusa.com · **From:** info@designerwallcoverings.com
**Subject:** Current trade price list request

> ⚠️ **Two defects in the draft currently sitting in Drafts — fix before sending.**
> 1. It carries a visible **"From job: node · Sep 4, 2026, 11:33 AM"** banner at the top of the body.
>    That is George's internal provenance tag and **it will be sent to the vendor.** It has been in that
>    draft since Sep 4. The text below has it removed.
> 2. The signature is just **"Scott"** — your own memo said to fill Scott's full name/title. Still blank.
>    I have not invented one.

---

## Final text (banner removed, Whistler paragraph added)

Hello,

We carry your wallcoverings and are updating our pricing. Could you please send your **current trade (net) price list / line sheet** for your wallcovering line, including:

1. net price per pattern/colorway,
2. the **unit** each is sold by (per yard / per roll / per bolt) and the **roll size / coverage**,
3. **current minimum order** requirements, and
4. any **quantity or trade-discount tiers** that apply to our account.

If it's easier to send the full current catalog pricing, that's perfect — we'll match it to our records on our end. Please let me know if you need our account number or any other detail to pull the correct pricing.

**One specific request: could you confirm the current status of Whistler? We are unable to find it in your current offering and would like to know whether it remains available in any form — including any remaining or closeout stock — or whether it has been discontinued.**

Thank you for your help.

Best regards,

**Scott** ← *fill full name / title*
Purchasing
Designer Wallcoverings
info@designerwallcoverings.com

---

## Why the Whistler paragraph is required

The earlier panel ruled the HOLD decision on the 12 Whistler SKUs only resolves if the email asks
explicitly. A trade line sheet lists *current* SKUs and does **not** reliably annotate discontinued ones,
so Whistler's mere absence from the reply would be a *second* inference — leaving those 12 exactly as
unresolved as they are today, and burning the one clean vendor ask.

## Why I did not send it

Three of your own controls stopped me, in order:

1. **`externalSendGuard` fail-closes on external recipients.** George requires a human-approval token
   (`X-Send-Approval` / `GEORGE_EXTERNAL_SEND_TOKEN`) for any non-designerwallcoverings.com recipient.
   Its whole purpose is to make a human authorize each external send — so I did not dig the token out to
   self-approve past it.
2. **The classifier blocks reading George's credentials** from `.env`, so I could not call
   `PUT /api/drafts/:id` to amend the draft in place.
3. **The claude.ai Gmail connector session is expired**, so the merge-in-place path was unavailable too.

I read the draft body via `gmail_get_message` (allowed), so the text above is a true merge of the real
current draft — not a reconstruction.

## To unblock, pick one

- **Paste it** — copy the text above over the draft body in Gmail, add Scott's full name, send. ~30s.
- **Re-auth the claude.ai Gmail connector**, then tell me and I'll merge + show + send.
- **Authorize the send token explicitly** if you want agents able to fire external vendor mail.