cycle 91: officer vp-dw-marketing CONFIRMED + framing tightened (5 scoped to leading-English here-is class, not fleet-wide; body-copy wallpaper = separate proper-noun-safe debt vs titles=0; memory update REQUIRED + AT10701 flag; negative-control clean scoped to preamble class); 2 follow-ons queued

cdf1e933b47ecfd4331bd5bff0204362259c1d08 · 2026-06-18 12:42:38 -0700 · Steve Abrams
Files touched

M scripts/ai-preamble-leak-sweep/FINDING.md
Diff

commit cdf1e933b47ecfd4331bd5bff0204362259c1d08
Author: Steve Abrams <steve@designerwallcoverings.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 18 12:42:38 2026 -0700

    cycle 91: officer vp-dw-marketing CONFIRMED + framing tightened (5 scoped to leading-English here-is class, not fleet-wide; body-copy wallpaper = separate proper-noun-safe debt vs titles=0; memory update REQUIRED + AT10701 flag; negative-control clean scoped to preamble class); 2 follow-ons queued
---
 scripts/ai-preamble-leak-sweep/FINDING.md | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/ai-preamble-leak-sweep/FINDING.md b/scripts/ai-preamble-leak-sweep/FINDING.md
index b7f12ec..920c3e8 100644
--- a/scripts/ai-preamble-leak-sweep/FINDING.md
+++ b/scripts/ai-preamble-leak-sweep/FINDING.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Full active scan (71,717, complete, PJ excluded):
 - **Don't trust one pattern.** Pass 1 (HIGH-confidence patterns: "here is a description/product description/revised/SEO…", "as an AI", "I cannot assist", etc.) → 5, all Versace.
 - **Broad-net upper bound:** a loose "here is / here's" net flagged 58 active bodies — but that pattern catches legitimate marketing copy ("Here is a striking damask…"). So 58 is an upper bound, NOT a defect count.
 - **Pass 2 (body-START classification)** — does the body BEGIN with the preamble (or "here is" + a description/colon word), the real leak signature? → **exactly 5, the SAME Versace products.** The other 53 "here is/here's" hits are mid-copy legitimate marketing (Designer Wallcoverings 28, Phillipe Romano 13, etc., all mid-sentence). So the true defect count is 5, corroborated by two methods — not 58 (over-count) and not missed.
-- **Negative control:** 71,712 bodies have no preamble → a body-start preamble is a true anomaly. 176 active products have an empty body (a separate thin-content signal, not a preamble defect).
+- **Negative control:** 71,712 bodies have no LEADING-"here is"-family preamble → a body-start preamble is a true anomaly. SCOPE (officer): "clean" here means clean of the SCANNED preamble class, NOT defect-free — both methods are anchored on English, leading-position "here is…" scaffolding, so they would UNDER-COUNT (a) preamble buried mid-body after a legit opening, (b) non-"here is" families ("Sure!", "Certainly,", "Of course —", "As requested,", markdown `## Product Description`, trailing "Let me know if…"), (c) non-English scaffolding. The 5 is the right number to ACT on for the defined class; a cheap anchored-prefix follow-on for the other scaffolding families is queued (not blocking). 176 active products have an empty body (a separate thin-content signal).
 
 ## 🔑 Memory reconciliation — the live state is BETTER than `banned-word-live-blast-radius` recorded
 The memory says ~25,131 LIVE products contain "Wallpaper" + ~68 AI-preamble leaks (incl. Thibaut AT10701). Measured TODAY by independent productsCount queries:
@@ -26,12 +26,24 @@ The memory says ~25,131 LIVE products contain "Wallpaper" + ~68 AI-preamble leak
 
 ## 📋 Disposition (GATED — Steve's call)
 1. **Fix the 5 Versace preamble descriptions (P3 — tiny, clean, unambiguous):** trim the leaked scaffolding line (or regenerate the description without the preamble). A 5-product surgical content edit, NOT a bulk rewrite. Steve-gated prod write.
-2. **"Wallpaper" TITLE debt = 0 → nothing to do on titles.** The ~9,486 any-field occurrences are mostly legitimate (vendor proper nouns + body copy); the banned-word bulk rewrite remains Steve-gated AND is far smaller / lower-priority than the memory implied. Do NOT propose a bulk title rewrite (titles are already clean).
-3. **Update the stale memory (flag):** `banned-word-live-blast-radius` (25,131 live + 68 preamble) does not match the measured live state (0 title-Wallpaper, 5 preamble) — recommend Steve let me update it.
+2. **"Wallpaper" TITLE debt = 0 → titles need nothing; but body-COPY "wallpaper" is a SEPARATE lower-priority debt (officer):** the 9,486 any-field bucket is heterogeneous — vendor PROPER-NOUNS ("Malibu Wallpaper", "Missoni Wallpaper") are legitimate brand names that MUST stay, but "wallpaper" in OUR OWN editorial body copy does carry brand-voice + on-page-SEO cost and violates the banned-word rule in customer-facing text. So: titles = nothing to do (clean win); body-copy "wallpaper" = a separate, lower-priority debt worth its own scoped, PROPER-NOUN-SAFE pass (denylist that excludes vendor names). Do NOT propose a bulk title rewrite (titles already clean).
+3. **Update the stale memory (REQUIRED, not just appropriate — officer):** `banned-word-live-blast-radius` (25,131 live + 68 preamble) materially misstates live state (0 title-Wallpaper, 5 preamble) and a wrong memory drives wrong future decisions — update it to today's measured reality, note the prior figure as historical/resolved. Keep **Thibaut AT10701 flagged for Steve** (was it fixed, archived, or re-handled? a one-line confirmation, not a silent assumption).
 4. **176 empty-body active products** = a separate thin-content residual (no description) — minor, future enrichment, not this defect.
 
 ## What this does NOT cover (named residuals)
-- **WEAK-pattern body issues** beyond preamble (truncated copy, placeholder "[insert]", duplicated boilerplate) — only LLM-preamble was targeted.
+- **Non-"here is" preamble families (officer follow-on):** an anchored-prefix scan for "Sure!/Certainly,/Of course/As requested", markdown `## Product Description` headers, trailing meta ("Let me know if…"), and non-English scaffolding — the blind spot of this cycle's English-leading-"here is" anchor. Cheap, queued, low-priority.
+- **Body-copy "wallpaper" proper-noun-safe pass** (disposition #2) — separate from vendor names.
+- **WEAK-pattern body issues** beyond preamble (truncated copy, placeholder "[insert]", duplicated boilerplate, the 176 empty bodies) — only LLM-preamble was targeted.
 - **Image CORRECTNESS** (c88), **full-404** (c88), **merchandising-DEPTH** (c87), **POD-vendor liveness** + **variant-oversold census** (c90 carry-forwards) — still open.
 
 _Cycle 91. DTD-picked A (unanimous 3/3). AI-preamble body-leak sweep: full active scan (71,717) → 5 genuine leaks, ALL Versace ("Here's the product description:" / "Okay, here is the product description for the wallcovering:"), confirmed by TWO independent passes (HIGH-pattern + body-START classification both = the same 5) with a broad-net guard (58 "here is" hits, 53 = legitimate mid-copy, NOT defects). "Wallpaper" TITLE blast-radius = 0 (titles normalized to Wallcovering; independent productsCount), ~9,486 any-field occurrences mostly legit vendor-names/body — both materially BETTER than the stale `banned-word-live-blast-radius` memory (25,131 + 68). Disposition: surgically fix the 5 Versace descriptions (P3, not a bulk rewrite); titles need nothing; update the stale memory (flag). PJ excluded. Read-only, $0, the 5-product fix gated._
+
+---
+## 🏛️ OFFICER SIGN-OFF — vp-dw-marketing: CONFIRMED (framing tightened; 2 scoped follow-ons queued)
+- **Q1 — 5-Versace count TRUSTWORTHY to act on, scoped honestly:** the two methods are genuinely independent in mechanism (literal-phrase match vs positional body-start), but share an English-leading-"here is" anchor → blind spot for mid-body preamble, non-"here is" families ("Sure!/Certainly/Of course/As requested", markdown `##` headers, trailing meta), and non-English. The broad 58-net is a partial backstop (53 legit-mid-copy + the same 5). So 5 = the right number to ACT on for the defined class; don't oversell it as "preamble eliminated fleet-wide." Anchored-prefix follow-on queued.
+- **Q2 — titles=0 is a clean verifiable win; "9,486 = nothing" is NOT fully right:** heterogeneous bucket — vendor proper-nouns legit/must-stay, but OUR body-copy "wallpaper" carries brand-voice + on-page-SEO cost and violates the banned-word rule in customer-facing text. Reframed to "titles need nothing; body-copy wallpaper = a separate lower-priority proper-noun-safe pass."
+- **Q3 — disposition RIGHT:** 5 surgical trims/regens (P3); a bulk rewrite would be wildly disproportionate (collateral risk to 71k clean bodies). Memory update is REQUIRED (a wrong memory drives wrong decisions), with AT10701's disappearance flagged for a one-line Steve confirmation (fixed/archived/re-handled).
+- **Q4 — one no-overstate:** the negative control proves clean of the SCANNED preamble class, NOT defect-free (the 176 empty bodies are a live counterexample) — "clean" kept scoped to the preamble class.
+- **Net:** act on the 5 Versace trims; update the stale memory (+ AT10701 confirm); queue two scoped low-priority follow-ons (non-"here is" preamble families; body-copy "wallpaper" proper-noun-safe pass). None blocking.
+
+CONFIRMED. 5 genuine Versace preamble leaks (surgical P3 fix); titles clean (0); body-copy "wallpaper" + non-"here is" families are scoped lower-priority follow-ons; the stale banned-word memory should be updated. Read-only, $0, fixes gated.
← 4aa2eb1 cycle 91: AI-preamble leak sweep (DTD unanimous A) — 5 genui · back to Dw Yolo Loop · cycle 92: CONSOLIDATION DIGEST (DTD unanimous E1) — 63 findi e22241f →