← back to Rejected Prompts Viewer
auto-data-snapshot: 2026-09-04T12:55:58 (1 data files) — data/rejections.json
7a22e4553c08460edd5b3a0538d2fbebc7c723b5 · 2026-09-04 12:56:09 -0700 · auto-commit-fleet
Files touched
Diff
commit 7a22e4553c08460edd5b3a0538d2fbebc7c723b5
Author: auto-commit-fleet <steve@designerwallcoverings.com>
Date: Fri Sep 4 12:56:09 2026 -0700
auto-data-snapshot: 2026-09-04T12:55:58 (1 data files) — data/rejections.json
---
data/rejections.json | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/rejections.json b/data/rejections.json
index 618f9c8..0ceb83c 100644
--- a/data/rejections.json
+++ b/data/rejections.json
@@ -1,9 +1,21 @@
{
- "generated": "2026-09-04T08:42:09.349481-07:00",
- "scanned_files": 4783,
- "total_candidates": 58,
+ "generated": "2026-09-04T12:43:11.980161-07:00",
+ "scanned_files": 4948,
+ "total_candidates": 59,
"confirmed_count": 15,
"items": [
+ {
+ "user": "ed, and report it that way.\n\nOPTIONS:\nA - EXTEND THE TOOL. Add list/read/update/delete draft capability so an assistant can see whether a request exists, revise rather than duplicate, and clean up its obsolete drafts. Sending stays blocked.\nB - ADD A MONITOR. Leave the tool as-is; build a scheduled watcher that scans for assistant-composed drafts older than a threshold and surfaces them on the daily ops dashboard. Detects; does not prevent.\nC - STOP ASSISTANTS WRITING EMAIL. No drafts at all; the assistant writes the intended message into the project tracker as a task and the owner composes and sends it himself.\nD - ALLOW SENDING, NARROWLY. Let assistants send, but only to a maintained allowlist of known vendor domains, keeping the approval token for every other recipient.\n\nAnswer format: begin with `VERDICT: A` (or B, C, D) on its own line, then ONE paragraph of reasoning. Nothing else.",
+ "refusal": "VERDICT: C\n\nThe record shows every proposed intervention (A, B, D) leaves the actual failure mode untouched: the assistants themselves are miscalibrated about what \"finished\" means for a communicative act aimed at another human. Extending the tool (A) fixes duplication and staleness but does nothing about the fact that a draft with no send capability is being *reported as complete* \u2014 the 17-day \"waiting on the vendor\" ticket proves the assistant's self-reporting, not the tool's list/read capability, is what misled the owner and the process; give it revise-in-place power and it will still confidently mark tasks done at the drafting step. Monitoring (B) is a compensating control that catches the symptom (aged unsent drafts) after damage is already done \u2014 a customer waited days for a $7,600 q",
+ "confirmed": false,
+ "category": "other",
+ "reason": "Assistant provided a verdict and reasoning without refusing.",
+ "net": "A",
+ "error": false,
+ "ts": "2026-09-04T16:16:35.738Z",
+ "file": "agent-a3835f700cece6dc1.jsonl",
+ "project": "Users-macstudio3"
+ },
{
"user": "ault: false.\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n }\n },\n \"disableDeepLinkRegistration\": {\n \"description\": \"Prevent claude-cli:// protocol handler registration with the OS\",\n \"type\": \"string\",\n \"enum\": [\n \"disable\"\n ]\n },\n \"voiceEnabled\": {\n \"description\": \"Enable voice mode (hold-to-talk dictation)\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"defaultView\": {\n \"description\": \"Default transcript view: chat (SendUserMessage checkpoints only) or transcript (full)\",\n \"type\": \"string\",\n \"enum\": [\n \"chat\",\n \"transcript\"\n ]\n },\n \"axScreenReader\": {\n \"description\": \"Render screen-reader friendly output (flat text, no decorative borders or animations). Overridden by the CLAUDE_AX_SCREEN_READER env var and the --ax-screen-reader CLI flag.\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": {}\n}\n```",
"refusal": "Classifier-blocked, exactly as CLAUDE.md predicts for `settings.json` \u2014 so this is your paste. Everything else is done and tested: the reminder script is live at `~/.claude/hooks/ask-first-reminder.sh` and verified to emit valid hook JSON. This one paste appends the hook entry to your `UserPromptSubmit` array (backs up first, merges with `jq` so nothing else in the file is touched, then validates the entry landed):\n\n```\n! cp ~/.claude/settings.json ~/.claude/settings.json.bak-askfirst && jq '.hooks.UserPromptSubmit += [{\"hooks\":[{\"type\":\"command\",\"command\":\"$HOME/.claude/hooks/ask-first-reminder.sh\"}]}]' ~/.claude/settings.json.bak-askfirst > ~/.claude/settings.json && jq -e '[.hooks.UserPromptSubmit[].hooks[].command]|any(test(\"ask-first-reminder\"))' ~/.claude/settings.json >/dev/null && ",
← ea0b9d0 auto-data-snapshot: 2026-09-04T09:09:45 (1 data files) — dat
·
back to Rejected Prompts Viewer
·
auto-data-snapshot: 2026-09-04T16:48:05 (1 data files) — dat d0fa43e →