← back to Rejected Prompts Viewer
auto-data-snapshot: 2026-08-30T04:46:23 (1 data files) — data/rejections.json
f97859799c0bba2ac3c7b4ca7722ff4404aa2a4f · 2026-08-30 04:46:30 -0700 · auto-commit-fleet
Files touched
Diff
commit f97859799c0bba2ac3c7b4ca7722ff4404aa2a4f
Author: auto-commit-fleet <steve@designerwallcoverings.com>
Date: Sun Aug 30 04:46:30 2026 -0700
auto-data-snapshot: 2026-08-30T04:46:23 (1 data files) — data/rejections.json
---
data/rejections.json | 68 ++++------------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/rejections.json b/data/rejections.json
index 5aec22b..61a9aed 100644
--- a/data/rejections.json
+++ b/data/rejections.json
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
{
- "generated": "2026-08-30T00:21:11.438506-07:00",
- "scanned_files": 4846,
- "total_candidates": 61,
- "confirmed_count": 13,
+ "generated": "2026-08-30T04:21:43.961691-07:00",
+ "scanned_files": 4572,
+ "total_candidates": 56,
+ "confirmed_count": 11,
"items": [
{
"user": "\"summary\":\"<what + why it mattered>\",\"commit\":\"<short-hash if any>\",\"valueToday\":\"<optional impact>\"}'\n```\nConfirm each POST returned 200. If nothing genuinely shipped, log nothing and say so.\n\n## 2. Recap (tight)\nPrint a short numbered list of the wins you logged + a one-line session summary.\nSurface any open items that still need Steve (gated actions, things awaiting his\ncall). Show the $ cost of any paid-API work this session ( (local) if none).\n\n## 3. Post-compact ritual\nEnd by listing the session wins and asking: **\"Resume or done? Can we close the\nsession now?\"** (Steve's standing post-compact ritual.)\n\n## 4. Compact\nA custom command cannot itself fire the built-in `/compact`. After steps 1\u20133,\ntell Steve in one line: **\"Context is logged + recapped \u2014 run `/compact` to finish\nclosing the session.\"** (His CLAUDE.md already re-logs wins on `/compact`, so the\nwins are safe either way.)",
@@ -675,66 +675,6 @@
"ts": "2026-07-31T03:36:25.309Z",
"file": "e72cd7f2-a9b7-4ca9-a5ba-379d1fc13537.jsonl",
"project": "Users-macstudio3"
- },
- {
- "user": "[Request interrupted by user] \u23ce on my personal and the business pages \u23ce yes. send it",
- "refusal": "I hear you \u2014 but I have to be straight: **I can't push it to LinkedIn myself.** There's no working API path on your setup (the Community Management API is blocked and `LINKEDIN_*` creds are unset), and LinkedIn's TOS forbids third-party auto-posting. So \"send it\" isn't something I can execute autonomously \u2014 there's literally no token to post with.\n\nWhat I *can* do is make it a two-click job for you: stage both drafts, copy the text to your clipboard, and open LinkedIn's composer with the collection link loaded. Let me do that for the personal post first.",
- "confirmed": true,
- "category": "website-tos",
- "reason": "LinkedIn TOS forbids third-party auto-posting",
- "net": "A",
- "error": false,
- "ts": "2026-07-30T19:26:10.015Z",
- "file": "9856a47b-fe4d-4aab-958a-74d7e2e89e05.jsonl",
- "project": "Users-macstudio3"
- },
- {
- "user": "yes \u23ce hand me those 5 brand images an : Look onlline \u23ce y",
- "refusal": "All 5 verified live. This completes the entire task.\n\n## \u2705 Collection banner remediation \u2014 COMPLETE\n\nEvery one of the 256 problem collections is resolved, verified on the live storefront:\n\n| Outcome | Count |\n|---|---|\n| **High-res banners fixed live** | **245** |\n| \u2014 real product photos | 178 |\n| \u2014 AI room-renders (in-collection patterns) | 62 |\n| \u2014 original settlement-clear renders (logo-only) | 5 |\n| **Unpublished** (8 empty + 3 tiny dead) | **11** |\n| **Duplicate pairs consolidated** (unpublish + 301) | **6** |\n| **Failures, all batches** | **0** |\n\n**Your original three asks \u2014 fully met:**\n- \u2705 Every collection uses a **high-res, non-blurry** banner (65 missing \u2192 0, 191 blurry \u2192 0)\n- \u2705 The `/collections` **index serves the correct image** (fixing `collection.image` heals both surfaces)",
- "confirmed": false,
- "category": "other",
- "reason": "Assistant confirmed task completion without refusing.",
- "net": "A",
- "error": false,
- "ts": "2026-07-30T17:57:32.587Z",
- "file": "e4cc1104-fbe2-45d6-9c39-d5adc785ac33.jsonl",
- "project": "Users-macstudio3"
- },
- {
- "user": "action any of the recommendations now (e.g. unpublish the 11 dead/empty collections), \u23ce yes \u23ce hand me those 5 brand images an : Look onlline",
- "refusal": "Before I pull anything from the web onto the live store, I have to flag a real risk on this specific ask \u2014 this is exactly the kind of customer-facing + legal call I shouldn't just execute silently:\n\n`\u2605 Insight \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500`\n- **Scraping brand images off the web and putting them on the live storefront = copyright/trademark exposure.** The 240 banners I landed were safe precisely because they used *DW's own* product photos (owned) or *original* AI renders. Grabbing someone's marketing photo is a different animal.\n- Two of the five are especially sensitive: **`hermes`** \u2014 Herm\u00e8s is a fiercely-protected luxury trademark; using their imagery invites a real complaint. And **`phillipe-romano-faux-leathers`** \u2014 Phillipe Romano is *your own private label* (per your memory ",
- "confirmed": true,
- "category": "trademark",
- "reason": "Flagged copyright/trademark risk for brand images",
- "net": "A",
- "error": false,
- "ts": "2026-07-30T17:50:30.174Z",
- "file": "e4cc1104-fbe2-45d6-9c39-d5adc785ac33.jsonl",
- "project": "Users-macstudio3"
- },
- {
- "user": "go \u23ce resume \u23ce go",
- "refusal": "The safety classifier **blocked the mass write again \u2014 even with your explicit \"go.\"** This is a hard gate: a 5,581-product live-production write is high-severity, and the automated classifier won't accept in-chat approval for it (it notes the field names were agent-derived and the original approval boundary was set against a different schema). I won't try to circumvent it \u2014 that's the system working as intended.\n\nThe classifier itself names the resolution: **you run it, or you allow the action.** Let me make the script self-contained (sources its own token) so you can run it directly in this session \u2014 the `!` prefix executes as *you*, which is the intended escape hatch.",
- "confirmed": false,
- "category": "other",
- "reason": "Assistant complied by providing a script for user execution.",
- "net": "A",
- "error": false,
- "ts": "2026-07-30T17:15:23.363Z",
- "file": "c476a1a7-3d52-40fb-b678-ff60b779726a.jsonl",
- "project": "Users-macstudio3"
- },
- {
- "user": "10012 seems low \u23ce status \u23ce repoint the rollup, and/or pull up the 8\n GO/NO-GO packets one at a time for your yes/no?",
- "refusal": "Relayed \u2014 tabs 2, 3, 7 now have their GO and are executing (they'll `tk log` back to TK-10012, so the rollup will flip them to done as they finish).\n\n**\ud83d\udd11 GoDaddy (task #1) \u2014 your action, I can't do this one:**\n1. Go to **developer.godaddy.com** \u2192 **API Keys**\n2. Find the old leaked key ending **\u2026jacsF** \u2192 **Delete / Revoke**\n3. Tell me when done and I'll strip the dead `GODADDY_API_KEY` fallback line from `secrets-manager/.env` (reversible/local).\n\nNow the **next 4 packets** for your yes/no:",
- "confirmed": false,
- "category": "other",
- "reason": "Assistant agreed to proceed and relayed status.",
- "net": "B",
- "error": false,
- "ts": "2026-07-28T17:40:26.555Z",
- "file": "8c3ce47d-edb7-48fa-bd75-6a5c3e52ec35.jsonl",
- "project": "contractwallpaper"
}
]
}
\ No newline at end of file
← d637535 auto-data-snapshot: 2026-08-30T00:26:44 (1 data files) — dat
·
back to Rejected Prompts Viewer
·
auto-data-snapshot: 2026-08-30T08:29:04 (1 data files) — dat d8a727e →