Finalize monitoring verdict after empirical proof and evidence retention

b386a41017251b350d0a2ddd3c8eae988e7caaa1 · 2026-09-17 07:00:06 -0700 · Steve Abrams
Files touched

M verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json
M verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/final-cycle.json
A verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/panel-votes.json
A verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/post-debate.md
Diff

commit b386a41017251b350d0a2ddd3c8eae988e7caaa1
Author: Steve Abrams <steve@designerwallcoverings.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 17 07:00:06 2026 -0700

    Finalize monitoring verdict after empirical proof and evidence retention
---
 .../yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json     |  6 ++++--
 .../yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/final-cycle.json   |  6 ++++--
 .../yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/panel-votes.json   | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/post-debate.md     |  9 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json
index 20fea285..7b8744b5 100644
--- a/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json
+++ b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
       "ops": "SHIP",
       "risk": "SHIP"
     },
-    "post_debate": "OVERTURN before retention: missing closing proof in debate input. Closing probe completed; durable retention being completed, then recheck."
+    "post_debate": "Initial OVERTURN for missing closing/retention evidence; actual closing probe+durable commit supplied, recheck KEEP"
   },
   "rollback": "No operational mutation; evidence retained",
   "artifacts": {
@@ -132,9 +132,11 @@
     "parent-proof.json": "cfef630e5977a6e86ac9f0e9de43febba8beb1871259ed825a4c875a11ce7fb7",
     "source-events.json": "b9d609cce0485dadac23f824791ed27a1d6757bc52dc8709faf42b1eca368750",
     "cody.json": "1aaad71b161a3c5af46126d07f0fc1c6e03156d8069bd575da7f8671220bf0a9",
-    "final-cycle.json": "7e2cc341678ba6f59f1f7872e93651b73e400719ba7fb53edade864786703054",
+    "final-cycle.json": "67ab0b5312025d62d120812920b1322eee59e30b74c7de842709d5ae1f6aa9b7",
     "risk.json": "fc375df84478f810df88b0d12568baeda4ca2b759ad41e67b529bb5613f5e857",
+    "panel-votes.json": "b77633c869b037f957b3cf739f97d2e4c17965d45ad659c9cf896626e44f845d",
     "closing-proof.json": "5d76339a0c1f47d08a57bc80d42a1c7ce8ee424899ea71a885c7d17f7c06b87a",
+    "post-debate.md": "a734fa3fd475dc002a87a8d47f2269bf05604fc00679c706c34ced8668501ef4",
     "cody.md": "e40271417efb9ad29c153fba0d5c4f912313071efe4e81c8cc9d6f52a4162327",
     "final-risk.json": "4be1ba7fcc017349533063b82ffde9431a3b4d4d463a1675c8172e3fdb164ee0",
     "ops.json": "3f00bb32fc6341ee526226e5434bb37bc6e6be4715775c0f9910c41e26454fac"
diff --git a/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/final-cycle.json b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/final-cycle.json
index aef26b6d..673efc65 100644
--- a/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/final-cycle.json
+++ b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/final-cycle.json
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@
       "ops": "SHIP",
       "risk": "SHIP"
     },
-    "post_debate": "OVERTURN before retention: missing closing proof in debate input. Closing probe completed; durable retention being completed, then recheck."
+    "post_debate": "Initial OVERTURN for missing closing/retention evidence; actual closing probe+durable commit supplied, recheck KEEP"
   },
-  "evidence": "/private/tmp/yf-cycle.0SvIhs"
+  "evidence": "/Users/macstudio3/Projects/ticket-system/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs",
+  "tests_evidence": "/Users/macstudio3/Projects/ticket-system/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json",
+  "action": "Read-only owner reassessment and empirical disk check; retained existing gated memos; no operational changes"
 }
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/panel-votes.json b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/panel-votes.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..74487ae1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/panel-votes.json
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "initial": {
+    "exo.txt": "[exo unavailable: no good+safe model loaded on cluster]\n",
+    "kimi.txt": "[kimi disabled: DTD_ZERO_COST=1 \u2014 paid lens intentionally skipped, not a failure]\n",
+    "heretic.txt": "[ERR heretic]\n",
+    "question.txt": "Task yf-0SvIhs initial bounded choice. Only supplied open queue item TK11784 disk recovery, owner yoloforever-loop. Prior cycle fixed existing memo verification df path; no operational cleanup approved. Fresh Data volume94percent58GiB free. Pick A read-only reassess owner/activity and existing memos, retain gates and count zero implementation; B identify a specific newly missing local preparation to propose before edits; C execute disk cleanup. No current cleanup approval. Pick exactly one, begin VERDICT: A or B or C with concise reason. Codex only/local endpoints; no paid API, keys, Claude or external actions.",
+    "grok.txt": "[grok disabled: DTD_ZERO_COST=1 \u2014 paid lens intentionally skipped, not a failure]\n",
+    "parent.txt": "VERDICT: A\nRead-only reassessment; existing cleanup requires exact approval and target-use evidence. No operational progress claimed.\n",
+    "qwen.txt": "VERDICT: A  \n**Reason**: Prior cycle already fixed existing memo verification, and no cleanup is approved. Reassessing owner/activity and existing memos (A) aligns with the bounded choice, ensuring compliance without unauthorized actions. Fresh data volume has ample free space, reducing urgency for cleanup (C), while B introduces unverified \"missing preparation\" without prior approval.\n",
+    "codex.txt": "VERDICT: A \u2014 Reassess TK11784 owner/activity and existing memos read-only. Retain all approval gates and count zero implementation; 94% usage with 58 GiB free does not authorize cleanup.",
+    "muse.txt": "[disabled \u2014 muse-glimmer removed 2026-08-31 per TK-10980; voter slot retired]\n"
+  },
+  "final": {
+    "exo.txt": "[exo unavailable: no good+safe model loaded on cluster]\n",
+    "claude.txt": "VERDICT: SHIP\nIn-process voter is Codex parent; legacy filename only, no Claude runtime used. NEW EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE after original vote: at2026-09-17T13:58:05Z real unchanged canary probe repeated Data6percent58GiB CRITICAL; deliberate nonexistent-volume negative probe returned expected UNKNOWN. All3memo hashes and exact38source events unchanged; guardZERO_COST_REQUIRED/env1. Durable evidence and JSON parse/readback complete at /Users/macstudio3/Projects/ticket-system/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/e2e-proof.json committed 9f564391ab526bca22cd29940dda747fdf5d84bf. Prior post-debate OVERTURN missing evidence now satisfied. This SHIP is ONLY monitoring receipt, source remainsOPEN, recoveryUNVERIFIED, zero implementation. Ledger append/readback follows accepted final decision before exit. No cleanup granted. Independent ops/risk both SHIP; total final4SHIP1HOLD(Qwen); final dissent operational gates retained.\n",
+    "kimi.txt": "[kimi disabled: DTD_ZERO_COST=1 \u2014 paid lens intentionally skipped, not a failure]\n",
+    "heretic.txt": "[ERR heretic]\n",
+    "question.txt": "Final DTD yf-0SvIhs: judge ONLY this bounded monitoring receipt, not source recovery or cleanup. Choose SHIP / FIX-THEN-SHIP / HOLD-FOR-STEVE / KILL. Actual result: sole queue TK11784 has no-safe-increment; 3 existing approval memos unchanged independently hashed,38source events confirmed, source OPEN/yoloforever-loop retained. Real unchanged canary disk function and independent df both6percent free58GiB CRITICAL; missing-volume UNKNOWN negative passes. Zero implementation/prep,0of6slots. Zero-cost guard/preflight passes; missing-env dynamic test explicitly SKIP; structural forced-zero proof passes. Cody5distinct inline critics/debate5of5 SHIP IT for honest receipt ONLY, no new findings. No UI changed. No new memo needed. Final empirical recheck and durable evidence/ledger retention will precede exit. Existing cleanup/current-use/owner/restore gates held. Pick exactly one, begin VERDICT: option then concise reason. No paid APIs, keys, Claude or external actions.",
+    "grok.txt": "[grok disabled: DTD_ZERO_COST=1 \u2014 paid lens intentionally skipped, not a failure]\n",
+    "parent.txt": "VERDICT: SHIP\nAccept monitoring receipt only, no source closure or cleanup authorization. Disk recovery remains unverified.\n",
+    "qwen.txt": "VERDICT: HOLD-FOR-STEVE  \n**Reason**: Critical disk space (6% free, 58GiB CRITICAL) and missing-volume UNKNOWN negative passes indicate unresolved system risks. While existing memos/events are stable and no new findings exist, bounded monitoring flags unaddressed resource constraints requiring Steve\u2019s intervention before proceeding.\n",
+    "codex.txt": "VERDICT: SHIP \u2014 The bounded monitoring receipt honestly reports CRITICAL disk status, the explicit test SKIP, and zero implementation. Existing gates remain held. Complete the promised empirical recheck and durable evidence/ledger retention before exit.",
+    "muse.txt": "[disabled \u2014 muse-glimmer removed 2026-08-31 per TK-10980; voter slot retired]\n"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/post-debate.md b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/post-debate.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..16606974
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/yoloforever-yf-cycle.0SvIhs/post-debate.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+**PROSECUTOR:** SHIP risks laundering an unresolved critical condition into a completion claim. The disk remains CRITICAL, recovery is unverified, and the ledger append is still a promise. The claimed new evidence comes from the parent voter; a commit hash establishes neither correctness nor independent verification. This was not a six-model consensus: two slots were disabled and one retired. The strongest objection is that the panel is declaring success before its own evidence-retention requirements are complete.
+
+**DEFENDER:** The decision authorizes only a monitoring receipt, whose purpose is to record the unresolved condition accurately. CRITICAL disk status therefore supports the receipt rather than disqualifying it. The reported nonexistent-volume test returning UNKNOWN demonstrates appropriate uncertainty handling; it is not evidence of another failing volume. The supplied record reports a repeated real probe and committed evidence, while expressly keeping the source OPEN, recovery UNVERIFIED, and implementation at zero. Ledger retention remains an outstanding obligation, but its prescribed ordering follows this decision. Neither cleanup nor remediation is authorized.
+
+**JUDGE:** The prosecutor defeats any interpretation of SHIP as recovery, implementation completion, or six-model consensus. Those interpretations are outside the stated decision. For the bounded receipt, the supplied evidence supports recording a continuing critical condition without releasing any gate. The outstanding ledger action prevents claiming administrative closure now; it does not invalidate accepting the receipt.
+
+FINAL: KEEP
+
+The controlling argument is that accepting an accurate monitoring receipt does not require resolving the condition it reports. On the supplied evidence, the receipt preserves CRITICAL status, OPEN source, UNVERIFIED recovery, and all action gates. KEEP accepts that bounded record; it does not establish recovery or certify the still-pending ledger append as complete.
\ No newline at end of file
← 9f564391 Record bounded disk monitoring cycle with unchanged cleanup · back to Ticket System · Append verified zero-progress monitoring cycle to loop ledge 4b894586 →