[object Object]

← back to Ticket System

Record ordered-loop launch and failure-boundary verification

fcba51cf27c873b43476e1fc9ca5570f9348bb8f · 2026-09-05 00:25:35 -0700 · Steve Abrams

Files touched

Diff

commit fcba51cf27c873b43476e1fc9ca5570f9348bb8f
Author: Steve Abrams <steve@designerwallcoverings.com>
Date:   Sat Sep 5 00:25:35 2026 -0700

    Record ordered-loop launch and failure-boundary verification
---
 verification/tk11287/cody-acceptance.json |  37 ++++++++
 verification/tk11287/e2e-proof.json       | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 verification/tk11287/final-dtd-post.txt   |   9 ++
 verification/tk11287/initial-dtd-post.txt |   9 ++
 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+)

diff --git a/verification/tk11287/cody-acceptance.json b/verification/tk11287/cody-acceptance.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8f616405
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/tk11287/cody-acceptance.json
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+{
+  "task_id": "TK-11287-drive-open-tickets-in-board-order-using",
+  "status": "complete",
+  "verdict": "SHIP IT for bounded queue/launch change",
+  "timestamp": "2026-09-05T07:14:47.551455+00:00",
+  "files_sha256": {
+    "scripts/codex-yoloforever.sh": "f5a36f1784ec614719067e67e78e483080527b4d6c24a591af0fa881d51d0de6",
+    "test/ordered-open-tickets.test.js": "8e6e9d089f740db4c284427289334c9de24df3b097eba9919f6d6af8ed15bd0a"
+  },
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "command": "node --test test/ordered-open-tickets.test.js",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "count": 11
+    },
+    {
+      "command": "node /tmp/tk11287-ordered-loop-review/reproduce.cjs",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "assertion": "both original missing-prompt and failed-mv reproductions return75 with workerLaunched=false"
+    },
+    {
+      "command": "git diff --check",
+      "result": "PASS"
+    },
+    {
+      "command": "zsh -n scripts/codex-yoloforever.sh",
+      "result": "PASS"
+    }
+  ],
+  "evidence_path": "/tmp/tk11287-ordered-loop-review/reproduction-results.json",
+  "reviewed_fix": "nonempty prompt precondition; explicitly checked snapshot/input promotions; chained input reads/writes; every caught failure returns75 before launch",
+  "limitations": "six execution cap, full dispositions, owner checks and agent/skill execution remain worker prompt policy; no real backlog completion proved",
+  "changed_paths": [],
+  "commits": [],
+  "cleanup": "temporary evidence retained; no production/source mutation",
+  "next_action": "Root independently accept bounded fix; verify real ordered worker cycle before claiming execution policy outcomes"
+}
diff --git a/verification/tk11287/e2e-proof.json b/verification/tk11287/e2e-proof.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c8897084
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/tk11287/e2e-proof.json
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+{
+  "ticket": "TK-11287-drive-open-tickets-in-board-order-using",
+  "intent": "Continue the existing unattended loop with an explicit board-rank open queue, scoped agents/skills and preserved gates.",
+  "risk_tier": "R3 operational runner integration; no new external action",
+  "timestamp": "2026-09-05T07:25:35.076875+00:00",
+  "build_identity": "6ef59fc3dd3be1717e0c8bb23a5ec32c6a7686ab",
+  "environment": "Mac launchd com.steve.codex-yoloforever,600s,existing dangerous-mode wrapper",
+  "baseline": "Existing loop repeatedly created monitoring-only tickets and had no explicit frozen open-ticket ordering.",
+  "commands": [
+    "npm test:40/40PASS",
+    "ticketmaster urgency.test.js:18assertionsPASS",
+    "zsh -n scripts/codex-yoloforever.sh",
+    "git diff --check",
+    "test/yoloforever-preflight-boundary.sh PASS (isolated real guard)",
+    "node ordered-open-tickets.js against actual local board",
+    "Cody reproduction before/after (missing prompt and failed promotion)",
+    "launchctl kickstart existing idle job; launchctl print and runner status",
+    "Actual current-input prefix/queue/hard-gate/zero-cost/order assertions"
+  ],
+  "assertions": [
+    {
+      "boundary": "queue",
+      "verdict": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "All status=open tasks ordered by live board rank; non-task and in-flight records separately identified."
+    },
+    {
+      "boundary": "runner-consumer",
+      "verdict": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "Real runner tested with inert consumer; live worker input persisted and exactly contains current prompt and queue."
+    },
+    {
+      "boundary": "failure",
+      "verdict": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "HTTP/malformed data, missing/empty prompt, queue promotion, input write/promotion all refuse worker; retry and overlap release tested."
+    },
+    {
+      "boundary": "cost-guard",
+      "verdict": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "Guard+hashed DTD artifacts unchanged; real isolated preflight and fresh actual-cycle preflight PASS."
+    },
+    {
+      "boundary": "runtime-start",
+      "verdict": "PASS",
+      "evidence": {
+        "timestamp": "2026-09-05T07:23:33.409Z",
+        "commit": "6ef59fc3dd3be1717e0c8bb23a5ec32c6a7686ab",
+        "queue_at": "2026-09-05T07:21:43.658Z",
+        "order": [
+          {
+            "position": 1,
+            "id": "TK-11233-gmc-disapproval-remediation-program-2900",
+            "rank": 12
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 2,
+            "id": "TK-11246-carnegie-mfr-sku-carries-a-url-category",
+            "rank": 29
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 3,
+            "id": "TK-11256-triage-dw-five-field-canary-fail-reid-wi",
+            "rank": 30
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 4,
+            "id": "TK-11201-sdg-publish-cadence-launchd-com-steve-sd",
+            "rank": 38
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 5,
+            "id": "TK-11253-gmc-advertises-2-offers-below-their-only",
+            "rank": 49
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 6,
+            "id": "TK-11243-133-phillipe-romano-blank-mfr-products-a",
+            "rank": 54
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 7,
+            "id": "TK-11249-govarbitrage-paid-tier-gates-declared-bu",
+            "rank": 56
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 8,
+            "id": "TK-11234-carnegie-fix-verification-reprice-gmc-pu",
+            "rank": 57
+          },
+          {
+            "position": 9,
+            "id": "TK-11250-load-vahallan-architectural-fabrics-whol",
+            "rank": 58
+          }
+        ],
+        "queue_count": 9,
+        "input_sha256": "4ac692fa598815af8f736683a3706f684854eca4f7ea9df8675bf6ce1e0c1932",
+        "runner_pid": "41809",
+        "started_at": "2026-09-05T07:21:41Z",
+        "checks": {
+          "prompt_prefix": "PASS",
+          "exact_queue_embedded": "PASS",
+          "hard_gates": "PASS",
+          "zero_cost_policy": "PASS",
+          "rank_order": "PASS"
+        },
+        "status": "RUNNING; completion not yet observed"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "boundary": "current-cycle-completion",
+      "verdict": "SKIP",
+      "reason": "Current worker is running; no complete-cycle health or all-backlog completion claim."
+    },
+    {
+      "boundary": "sequential-agent-policy",
+      "verdict": "SKIP",
+      "reason": "Prompt requires complete dispositions, six sequential safe increments and agent/skill use; not mechanically enforced or proven for the full active cycle."
+    }
+  ],
+  "review": {
+    "initial_DTD": "A2/2valid,availability2/6,postKEEP",
+    "cody": "TwoP1s reproduced and fixed; independent ACCEPT after11focusedchecks",
+    "final_DTD": "SHIP1/HOLD1 valid2/6; SHIP tie-break scoped local code+fresh verification; postKEEP; reduced confidence for prior unexplained wrapper exit1",
+    "families": {
+      "Claude": "disabledzero-cost",
+      "Codex": "gpt-6-astra via CLI;SHIP",
+      "Qwen": "qwen3:14b;HOLD",
+      "Grok": "unavailable",
+      "Kimi": "unavailable",
+      "Muse": "unavailable"
+    },
+    "clarify": "No decision-changing user preference remains; user explicitly reaffirmed unattended dangerous mode. External gates preserved."
+  },
+  "prior_error": "Old active wrapper finished its worker then had duplicate exit0/1. File-edit/resume mismatch is plausible but unconfirmed; current fresh start verified, current exit still pending. Do not edit active wrapper in place.",
+  "side_effects": "Local source/docs/tests, canonical ticket logs/designation+authorized A2A DMs; kicked existing idle job. No duplicate loop or schedule installation; no external sends or catalog writes.",
+  "rollback": "Revert6ef59fc only while runner idle, then verify next startup. No schedule/guard rollback necessary.",
+  "verdict": "PASS scoped implementation and runtime startup; perpetual backlog work ONGOING"
+}
diff --git a/verification/tk11287/final-dtd-post.txt b/verification/tk11287/final-dtd-post.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..32ff0ce2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/tk11287/final-dtd-post.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+**PROSECUTOR:** SHIP is premature. Forty passing tests and isolated checks do not explain the previous wrapper’s exit1/unset-variable failure. Editing during execution is a suspected cause, not a demonstrated diagnosis. An unattended dangerous-mode loop magnifies failures, and prompt-only sequential limits cannot establish enforcement. If SHIP implies runtime readiness, the evidence does not support it.
+
+**DEFENDER:** The proposed SHIP authorizes a scoped local commit, followed by a fresh runtime cycle before claiming health. It does not authorize deployment or certify policy enforcement. Exit75/noWorker has independent confirmation; the earlier failure remains explicitly unresolved. Preserving an already-authorized loop does not expand authority. Requiring Steve’s approval for local verification would add a gate without addressing the missing evidence.
+
+**JUDGE:** The prosecutor establishes a decisive objection to declaring runtime health, but not to committing the scoped change. The controlling distinction is the action actually authorized: local release with runtime verification outstanding, while deployment remains gated. A failed fresh cycle would defeat a subsequent health claim.
+
+FINAL: KEEP
+
+The preliminary decision is justified within its stated scope: commit the tested local code, then verify a fresh runtime cycle before claiming operational success. The unexplained wrapper failure prevents a runtime-health conclusion but does not establish that the local commit is unsound; neither deployment authorization nor mechanically enforced sequential limits follows from SHIP.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/verification/tk11287/initial-dtd-post.txt b/verification/tk11287/initial-dtd-post.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b49f982e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/tk11287/initial-dtd-post.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+**PROSECUTOR:** A risks formalizing the failure it claims to fix. Sorting by live board rank does not guarantee progress: the same blocked or repeatedly actionable high-ranked tickets can consume every cycle while lower-ranked work starves. Requiring a disposition for every open ticket also conflicts with a six-increment execution budget unless bookkeeping is explicitly separated from execution. Delegation and evidence requirements can produce more administrative activity without advancing source tickets. A deterministic queue alone solves ordering, not liveness.
+
+**DEFENDER:** Those objections identify implementation requirements, not grounds to reject A. A explicitly requires evidence-backed dispositions, records gates and skips on source tickets, and prohibits new monitoring-only tickets. A gate or skip therefore cannot count as an executed safe increment; the worker must continue to eligible work. The six-increment cap bounds mutations, while disposition accounting explains what happened to the remaining tickets. Sorting by board rank respects the stated priority constraint; equal service across ranks is not established as a requirement. Reusing the scheduler, lock, cost guard, and hard gates also limits the scope of change.
+
+**JUDGE:** The prosecutor correctly distinguishes ordered processing from guaranteed progress. The defender nevertheless establishes that A contains the necessary accountability mechanisms and that its execution cap need not cap ticket assessment. Nothing supplied demonstrates that replacing the existing loop would resolve these weaknesses more effectively.
+
+FINAL: KEEP
+
+The controlling argument is that A directly connects each cycle to source-ticket execution or an evidence-backed reason for nonexecution while preserving the existing operational constraints. Its strongest vulnerability is allowing bookkeeping to masquerade as progress; enforcing the stated distinction between safe increments and recorded gates or skips addresses that vulnerability without overturning the decision.
\ No newline at end of file

← 6ef59fc3 Process open tickets in board order with guarded worker inpu  ·  back to Ticket System  ·  auto-data-snapshot: 2026-09-05T00:27:41 (1 data files) — dat 9b04f32c →